![]() |
| Taken from www.christianlandmark.com |
Studying doctrine
and systematic theology is challenging for me and I often wonder if it is a
futile exercise. No matter how many
theologies and philosophies we develop, human finiteness prohibits us from
truly understanding and explaining the Divine.
Though our attempts to explain God’s character and actions may be
intellectually and even spiritually impressive, they are not sufficient to
explain the mind and actions of a perfect God whose thoughts and ways are higher
than created man’s (cf. Isaiah 55:9).
For instance, theologians may battle Calvinism and Arminianism or
impassibility and passibility. While one
may prefer one theological position and develop a doctrine of God or systematic
theology as a result, no one can claim certainty as to his position. Therefore, I have perceived theology as an
interesting and faith increasing enterprise that can only provide its students
with a “best guess” as to the truth of God’s nature and actions.
However, I am seeing that my
perspective of God borders on Neo-Platonism at times; the notion that God is
too great to be known directly opposes Christianity.[1] Platonism holds that God is considered “non-being,”
for He is too great for the “unaided human mind” to conceive.[2] Within Christianity is the truth that God has
revealed Himself so that He may be known.[3] Christianity is God revealed, not God
unknown. Such
revelation is found in the Bible and in Jesus Christ. Doctrine cannot claim to have
God explained or place limitations upon Him, but doctrine is necessary to
ensure that what God has revealed is faithfully preserved. God is not “too great to be known” for in His
greatness, God chose revelation.
Theological study is not man’s attempt to explain the inexplicable, but man’s
response to God’s revelation. God
described David as a man after His own heart (1 Samuel 13:14); believers must
seek to understand the heart of the God they aim to please. Theology and doctrinal studies aim to explain
God’s heart systematically, intellectually, and rationally. While it may seem odd to systematically
explain matters of the heart, Christian orthodoxy (right belief) and orthopraxy (right practice) require axioms
by which disciples can order and center their lives. I can embrace theology more willingly if I
forsake that it offers certitude and accept that it is man’s best response to
God’s revelation which produces enhanced spiritual intimacy and
worship of the Creator. Theology as
solely an academic endeavor will puff up, but theology as a means to systematize
what is known about God so that He may be better loved (and therefore obeyed)
builds up.[4] I admit that it is difficult to balance
reverence for a holy and mysterious God and intellectual doctrinal study, but
such balance is a worthy effort for it contributes to overall Christian
orthodoxy, orthopraxy, and personal relationship with God Himself.
"Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth" (2 Timothy 2:15 KJV).
[1]Gerald
Bray, The Doctrine of God (Downers
Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1993): 34.
[2]Ibid.
[3]Ibid.
[4]cf.
1 Corinthians 8:1, where Paul states that knowledge puffs up but love builds
up.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Please add to the discussion! I'll trust you to be grown up about it...